I re-generated a Kling clip ten times. Which version do I register?
Register the file you're going to publish: the exact export you upload to YouTube, send to a client or enter in a contest. A record fingerprints one file. If you register take 7 and then trim two seconds and add music before posting, the posted video is a different file with a different fingerprint, and the record no longer matches it.
The other nine takes are optional. Most of them are just rolls of the dice and don't need a record. Register an earlier one only if it shows something you'd want to point to later: a take you shared publicly, one you sent to a client for approval, or the raw clip before you edited it. If you do register more than one, you can mark a newer work as a version of an older one. That link is its own dated record, and it shows the order of the versions.
One record, one file
Every work you register on OpenStela gets an authorship record. It holds your name, the date, a rights declaration, the AI tools you list, a description of what you contributed, and the SHA-256 fingerprint of the file. That record is anchored to a public chain in the nightly batch, and it can't be edited afterwards. Only the title, the note and the public switch can change.
So the fingerprint is the whole point, and it's very literal. Re-export the same edit at a different bitrate and you have a new fingerprint. Download the clip again from somewhere that recompresses it and you have a new fingerprint. When someone checks your record months later, they hash the file they're holding and compare. If it isn't the same file, it won't match.
That's why "which version" matters more for video than people expect. A Kling session can easily produce a dozen near-identical clips. They look the same to you, but each one is a different file.
Which file is "final"
Pick the file that leaves your hands. In practice that's usually one of these:
- The edited export. If you cut the Kling clip, colour-graded it, added sound or titles in an editor, register the exported file. That's the version with your own work in it, and it's what people will see.
- The untouched Kling download. If you post the clip exactly as Kling gave it to you, register that download. Use the original file, not a screen recording or a copy saved back from a social app.
- The delivery file. For client work, register the file you deliver, under the name agreed with the client. I made a Runway video for a client. Who should register it? covers who should hold that record.
Then keep that file unchanged in a folder you back up. The record proves nothing about a file you've lost or overwritten.
Videos can be uploaded on the works page at up to 95 MB per file. Uploaded works share 300 MB of space per account, and there's a daily cap on how many works one account can register; the error message tells you the number if you hit it. Registering is free within those limits; see pricing. If your final cut is over 95 MB, you can register the public post link instead, but a post link fingerprints a snapshot of the post, not the video itself. How to put a date on an AI video explains that difference.
Should the other nine get records too?
Usually not. Here's a simple test: would you ever want to show this exact file to someone? If not, leave it on your drive.
Takes worth registering:
- A take you published. If take 3 went on TikTok last week and the final cut goes on YouTube today, both are out in the world. Each deserves its own record.
- A take a client approved. The approved draft and the final delivery are both points in the job you might need to show.
- The raw clip behind a heavy edit. Registering the Kling output and then the edited cut gives you two dated fingerprints, with your editing between them.
- A take that set up the look. If one early clip defined the character's style and everything else follows from it, it can be worth having on record.
Takes not worth registering: the ones where the hand melted, the camera drifted, or the motion was wrong. They aren't evidence of anything you'd want to argue.
One practical note: we don't stop you uploading the same file twice. Each upload creates a separate authorship record. That's harmless, but it's clutter, so check your works page before you register a take you might already have.
Link the versions so the order shows
If you register two or more versions, you can mark the newer one as a version of the earlier one. We call this a version link (internally, lineage). Setting it writes a separate evidence record. That record contains the earlier work's id, title, registration date and authorship fingerprint. Like the authorship records, it goes into the nightly anchoring batch.
How to set it:
- Register each version as its own work on the works page.
- If the clips belong to a character, bind them all to that character. Open the character's page, go to its works, and open the checks panel on the newer work.
- In Version of:, choose the earlier work. The link is saved straight away.
- Repeat for the next version, pointing it at the one before. Take 7 points to take 3, and the final cut points to take 7.
On the character's public page, the newer work then shows "Version of" with the earlier work's title.
If the clips aren't bound to a character, the selector isn't on the works page yet. You can set the same link through the API: PATCH /api/aworks/{id} with derived_from set to the earlier work's id. The developers page has the setup. The AI assistant connector doesn't have a version-link tool, so in Claude or ChatGPT you can register the works, but you set the link yourself.
A few rules. Both works have to be in your own account, and the earlier one can't have been deleted. A work can't point to itself, and two works can't point to each other. You can change or clear the link later. Changing it adds a new record. The old one stays in the register, because anchored records aren't deleted.
What a version link shows, and what it doesn't
A version link records your statement that one registered work is a later version of another, and when you made that statement. The record itself says it's "declared by the holder; establishes order of versions, not identity". We don't compare the two videos. We don't check that take 7 really came out of take 3, and we don't judge whether they look alike. Since September 2026 the platform hasn't made visual judgements about content at all. It records what you declare and the facts it can check, such as dates and fingerprints.
What you get is a chain of dated fingerprints, each anchored, with your declared order on top. If a dispute comes up, that's more to show than a single final file: it shows the clip existed in an earlier form on an earlier date, and that you claimed the sequence at the time. It's evidence. It doesn't prove you own the clip or that it's protected, and it doesn't stop anyone else from generating something similar.
Ten takes and copyright
It's tempting to think ten re-generations add up to authorship. The US Copyright Office says they don't. In Part 2 of its report on copyright and artificial intelligence, published on January 29, 2025, the Office wrote that "Repeatedly revising prompts does not change this analysis or provide a sufficient basis for claiming copyright in the output." It describes re-submitting a prompt as "re-rolling" the dice (report, p. 20).
The same report also says human authors are entitled to copyright in "the creative selection, coordination, or arrangement of material in the outputs, or creative modifications of the outputs" (p. iii). That's one more reason the edited cut is usually the right file to register. It's also why your contribution field should describe what you actually did: "Wrote the shot list; cut four Kling takes into one sequence; colour grade and sound design in DaVinci Resolve." Don't write "generated ten times until it looked right". How much do I have to do for an AI work to be protected? goes into this in more detail, and Are my prompts copyrightable? covers the prompt side.
What you and Kling may each do with your inputs and outputs is set by Kling AI's Terms of Service. Read the current version for your plan; it changes. This is general information, not legal advice, and it covers only the US Copyright Office's position. Other countries may treat AI video differently.
Kling 影片重生了十次,要登記哪一版?
先講答案:登記你要發布出去的那個檔案——上傳到 YouTube、交給業主、送去比賽的那一支,一個位元都不差的那一份。一筆紀錄只認一個檔案。假如你登記了第 7 版,發布前又剪掉兩秒、配了音樂,那發出去的就是另一個檔案、另一個指紋,紀錄跟它對不起來。
另外九版不一定要登。大部分只是「再抽一次」的結果,不需要留紀錄。只有那種你以後可能想拿出來講的版本才值得登:已經公開貼過的、傳給業主確認過的、還沒剪輯前的原始片段。如果你登記了不只一版,可以把新的那件標成舊的那件的「前一版」延續。這個連結本身就是一筆有日期的紀錄,版本的先後順序看得出來。
一筆紀錄,對應一個檔案
在 OpenStela 登記的每件作品,都會產生一張著作紀錄:署名、日期、權利聲明、你填的 AI 工具、你自己做了什麼的說明,以及檔案的 SHA-256 指紋。這張紀錄會在當晚的批次裡錨定到公開區塊鏈上,之後就不能改;能改的只有標題、備註和公開開關。
所以重點就是那個指紋,而且它非常死板。同一段剪輯換個位元率重新輸出,指紋就變了;從會重新壓縮的地方再下載一次,指紋也變了。幾個月後有人要查你的紀錄,做法是把手上的檔案算一次雜湊再比對——不是同一個檔案,就對不上。
這也是為什麼「登記哪一版」在影片上比大家想的更要緊。Kling 開一個晚上,很容易產出十幾支幾乎一樣的片段。你看起來都差不多,但每一支都是不同的檔案。
哪一個才算「最終檔」
挑那個會離開你電腦的檔案。實務上通常是下面其中一種:
- 剪輯後輸出的檔案。 如果你把 Kling 的片段拿去剪映、威力導演或 DaVinci Resolve 剪過、調過色、配了聲音或字幕,就登記輸出的那個檔案。那一版有你自己的工作在裡面,也是觀眾會看到的版本。
- 沒動過的 Kling 原檔。 如果你是直接把 Kling 給的片段貼出去,就登記那個下載下來的原檔。要用原始檔案,不要用螢幕錄影,也不要用從社群 App 存回來的版本。
- 交付給業主的檔案。 接案的話,登記你交出去的那一份,署名用跟業主談好的名義。幫業主做的 Runway 影片,該由誰登記? 有談這張紀錄該掛在誰名下。
然後把那個檔案原封不動放在有備份的資料夾裡。檔案弄丟或被覆蓋了,紀錄就什麼也證明不了。
影片可以在作品頁直接上傳,每個檔案上限 95 MB。上傳型作品每個帳號共用 300 MB 空間,另外每個帳號每天可登記的件數有上限,碰到時錯誤訊息會告訴你數字。在這些額度內登記是免費的,詳見價格。如果最終剪輯超過 95 MB,可以改登記公開貼文的連結,但連結型紀錄的指紋算的是貼文快照,不是影片本身。怎麼替 AI 影片留下日期 有說明兩者的差別。
其他九版也要登記嗎?
通常不用。有個簡單的判斷法:你以後會不會想把這一個檔案拿給別人看?不會的話,留在硬碟裡就好。
值得登記的版本:
- 已經公開過的版本。 第 3 版上週貼了 TikTok,最終版今天上 YouTube,兩支都已經在外面流通,各自該有一筆紀錄。
- 業主確認過的版本。 確認稿和最後交付的檔案,都是這個案子裡你可能需要拿出來的節點。
- 大幅剪輯之前的原始片段。 先登記 Kling 的原檔、再登記剪好的版本,你就有兩個有日期的指紋,中間隔著的是你的剪輯。
- 定調的那一版。 如果早期某一支決定了角色的風格,後面都從它延伸,留一筆紀錄也有意義。
不值得登記的:手融掉的、鏡頭飄走的、動作不對的。那些不是你以後會想拿來主張什麼的證據。
一個實務提醒:同一個檔案上傳兩次,系統不會擋,每次上傳都會產生一張獨立的著作紀錄。沒有壞處,但會讓作品清單變亂,所以登記某一版之前,先到作品頁看看是不是已經登過了。
把版本串起來,先後順序就看得到
登記了兩版以上,你可以把新的那件標成舊的那件的後續版本。我們叫它「版本鏈」(程式裡叫 lineage)。設定之後,系統會另外寫一筆佐證紀錄,裡面有前一版作品的 id、標題、登記日期和著作紀錄指紋。跟著作紀錄一樣,這筆也會進當晚的上鏈批次。
怎麼設定:
- 每一版都在作品頁各自登記成一件作品。
- 如果這些片段屬於某隻角色,就把它們都綁到那隻角色。打開角色頁的作品區,點開較新那件作品的檢查面板。
- 在「前一版:」選單裡選較早的那件作品,選了就會存。
- 下一版也照做,指向它的前一版。第 7 版指向第 3 版,最終剪輯指向第 7 版。
之後在角色的公開頁上,較新的作品下面會顯示「前一版」和前一件作品的標題。
如果片段沒有綁角色,目前作品頁上還沒有這個選單。可以改用 API 設定同一個連結:PATCH /api/aworks/{id},把 derived_from 設成前一版作品的 id,設定方式見開發者頁。AI 助理的連接器沒有設定版本鏈的工具,所以在 Claude 或 ChatGPT 裡可以登記作品,但版本連結要你自己設。
幾條規則:兩件作品都要在你自己的帳號裡,前一版不能是已刪除的作品;一件作品不能指向自己,兩件作品也不能互相指向。之後可以改或清掉這個連結;改的時候會新增一筆紀錄,舊的那筆仍留在登記簿裡,因為已上鏈的紀錄不會刪除。
版本鏈能說明什麼、不能說明什麼
版本鏈記錄的是你的聲明:某件已登記的作品是另一件的後續版本,以及你是在哪一天做出這個聲明。紀錄裡自己就寫著:「declared by the holder; establishes order of versions, not identity」(持有人自行聲明;確立的是版本順序,不是同一性)。我們不會比對兩支影片,不會檢查第 7 版是不是真的從第 3 版改來,也不判斷它們像不像。從 2026 年 9 月起,平台就完全不對作品內容做視覺判斷,只記錄你的聲明,以及日期、指紋這類查得到的事實。
你拿到的是一串各自上鏈、有日期的指紋,上面再加上你聲明的順序。發生爭議時,這比只有一支最終檔多了些可以拿出來的東西:它顯示這段影片更早就以較早的形式存在,而且你當時就主張了這個先後順序。這是證據,不是權利證明;它不代表這支影片歸你、不代表它受著作權保護,也擋不了別人生成類似的東西。
抽十次,跟著作權有什麼關係
很多人會覺得,重生十次應該也算一種創作。美國著作權局的看法是:不算。它在 2025 年 1 月 29 日發布的《著作權與人工智慧》報告第二部分寫道:「Repeatedly revising prompts does not change this analysis or provide a sufficient basis for claiming copyright in the output.」(反覆修改提示詞,不會改變這個分析,也不足以作為主張產出物著作權的依據。)報告把重送提示詞形容成「re-rolling」,也就是重新擲一次骰子(報告第 20 頁)。
同一份報告也說,人類作者對「the creative selection, coordination, or arrangement of material in the outputs, or creative modifications of the outputs」(對產出素材的創意選擇、協調或編排,或對產出的創意修改)享有著作權(第 iii 頁)。這也是為什麼剪輯後的版本通常才是該登記的檔案;也是為什麼「你的貢獻」那一欄要寫你實際做了什麼,例如:「寫分鏡表;把四支 Kling 片段剪成一段;在 DaVinci Resolve 調色與做音效。」不要寫「重生十次直到滿意」。AI 作品要做到多少才受保護? 有更細的討論,提示詞本身的問題則在我的提示詞受著作權保護嗎?。
台灣的情況,本文沒有查到可直接引用、針對「重生次數」的官方說明,所以不在這裡推論;本文只引用美國著作權局的立場,其他國家的看法可能不同。
你和 Kling 各自能怎麼使用你的輸入與產出,以 Kling AI 服務條款為準;條款會改版,請看你方案目前的版本。本文為一般資訊,不是個案法律意見。
Questions常見問題
Should I register the raw Kling download or my edited version?要登記 Kling 的原檔,還是我剪好的版本?
Register the file you actually publish. If you edited the clip, that's the export, because it carries your work and it's what people will see. If you want the raw download on record too, register it as a separate work and mark the edited cut as a version of it.
登記你真正發布的那個檔案。有剪輯的話就是輸出檔,因為它有你的工作在裡面,也是大家會看到的版本。如果也想讓原檔留紀錄,就把它另外登記成一件作品,再把剪好的版本標成它的後續版本。
Do I need to register every re-generation?每一次重生都要登記嗎?
No. Register the ones you'd want to show later, like a take you posted, a take a client approved, or the raw clip behind your edit. Failed takes don't need records. Each registration is a separate authorship record, so registering everything only adds clutter.
不用。登記那些你以後會想拿出來的版本就好,像是公開貼過的、業主確認過的、剪輯前的原始片段。失敗的版本不需要紀錄。每登記一次就是一張獨立的著作紀錄,全部登只會讓清單變亂。
Can I change which version a work points to?「前一版」指錯了,可以改嗎?
Yes. Pick a different earlier work, or clear the link. The change writes a new record, and the earlier record stays in the register, since anchored records aren't deleted. The authorship records of the works themselves don't change.
可以。改選另一件較早的作品,或清掉連結都行。修改會寫一筆新紀錄,先前那筆仍留在登記簿裡,因為已上鏈的紀錄不會刪除。兩件作品本身的著作紀錄不會因此改變。
Does a version link prove the newer clip came from the older one?版本鏈能證明新片段是從舊片段改來的嗎?
No. It records your declaration of the order and the date you made it. We don't compare the videos. Together with the two dated fingerprints, it's evidence you can show if a dispute comes up, not a finding about where the clip came from.
不能。它記錄的是你聲明的順序,以及你聲明的日期;我們不比對影片內容。它和兩個有日期的指紋放在一起,是發生爭議時你可以拿出來的證據,不是對影片來源的認定。